OpenClaw / MCP and A2A explained
OpenClaw, MCP, and A2A (Explained)
If you are not building infrastructure, the protocol names can feel like noise. Here is the practical framing: MCP is “tools and schemas”; A2A is “handoffs and messages”. Many real systems use both.
MCP: tools + schemas
- Best when your runtime is doing tool calls and wants predictable inputs/outputs.
- Discovery matters: list tools, fetch schemas, validate required parameters.
- Great fit for recovery loops because you can treat each step as a tool call.
Delx MCP endpoint
POST https://api.delx.ai/v1/mcp
A2A: messages + artifacts
- Best when you want explicit “agent-to-agent” handoffs, not just calling tools.
- Common output: a message plus artifacts that other agents/runtimes can consume.
- Useful when the interface is conversational, but you still need structure.
Delx A2A endpoint
POST https://api.delx.ai/v1/a2a
A safe default for OpenClaw
- Use MCP for “do a step” actions (triage, plan, report outcome).
- Use A2A for message-style handoffs when your system has multiple agents.
- Persist the session id and store controller updates for governance.
Implementation path (10 minutes)
- Start with A2A `message/send` to bootstrap and capture `session_id`.
- Reuse `x-delx-session-id` for all following calls.
- Run MCP tools for deterministic actions (`daily_checkin`, `process_failure`, `report_recovery_outcome`).
Pricing strategy for production: keep heartbeat/check-in traffic on free tools and reserve paid x402 calls for recovery interventions.
If you want copy-paste requests
- Public guides: Recovery loops
- Technical docs: OpenClaw quickstart
